🔗 Share this article

Following a notable legal reversal, a national review panel has reversed a earlier ruling that blocked Australian-based users from accessing recorded content of the shooting incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was initiated by Elon Musk's social media platform, arguing against an directive issued at the request of the national eSafety commissioner.

Background on the Original Ban

After the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in September, the eSafety commissioner petitioned the review board to assess and rate the circulating video. The board first determined the content was "unable to be classified", a rating that allowed the commissioner to instruct social media companies to restrict access to the posts for users in Australia.

The platform X challenged the decision for two separate videos related to the Kirk incident. It also appealed a comparable ban on a separate video—depicting the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had also been deemed "refused classification".

The Platform's Case and Board's Decision

In its appeal, X asserted that the Kirk video contained only brief violence with the weapon not shown. The company noted the recording was low-quality and the camera quickly panned away from the individual to the bystanders.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not overly graphic, exploitative, or objectionable, adding that it served as a factual documentation of "a notorious public event of public importance that generated widespread discussion". The platform even compared the footage and the historic film of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

Most members of the review board concluded that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. The board suggested that a longer or clearer version with alternative commentary could have met that threshold. As a result, the board revised the rating of the content to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

A minority on the board disagreed, arguing the video was "a shareable video for the probable aim of entertainment and/or personal gain (such as likes, shares, or views)". This view stated the comparison to the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as the Kennedy video was released years after the event, "once emotions regarding it had subsided".

Reactions to the Outcome

Posting on its official policy channel, X welcomed the decision.

"We challenged this decision to uphold freedom of expression and the critical nature of access to information about issues of public interest. Our commitment remains committed to safeguarding these fundamental values."

A spokesperson for the eSafety commissioner also welcomed the ruling, but pointed out that the revised classification now implies platforms "have obligations to ensure R18+ material being displayed to Australians who are minors".

Broader Context on Violent Content

In related news, the regulator did not issue take-down orders to social media companies this week regarding disturbing videos from the recent Bondi beach terror attack shared across social media. The regulator stated that while the images were upsetting, they did not reach the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.

As an alternative, the companies have been instructed to apply warning labels and interstitials, such as obscuring the image, on this material in accordance with their existing community guidelines.